Screenwriting Mastery › Forums › The Contained Screenplay › Contained 16 › Lesson 4
-
Lesson 4
Posted by cheryl croasmun on April 2, 2024 at 8:14 pmReply to post your assignment.
Alfred Dunham replied 1 year, 1 month ago 4 Members · 3 Replies -
3 Replies
-
What I learned while doing this assignment is that it is FUN to examine a deeper motivational layer for each of the select characters in a contained screenplay. Look below in the Secret Identity section of Captain Davis’ section and you’ll find it amazing that I might suggest that she is the mole (traitor) in this screenplay. I didn’t think about this until the assignment asked me to!
PILOT: CAPTAIN RACHEL “RAPTOR” DAVIS
Internal Character Depth
· Motivation: Captain Davis’s outward goal is to protect her crew and complete her missions successfully. Internally, however, she wrestles with feelings of inadequacy and impostor syndrome, constantly seeking validation and reassurance that she can handle the immense responsibilities she feels.
· Secret: Despite her outward confidence, Davis carries the burden of a deep-seated insecurity about her abilities, fearing that she will never truly measure up to the standards set by her father, a many times decorated career aviator.
· Wound: The wound that Davis carries is the memory of traumatic experiences during her training, where she was subjected to harassment and discrimination by male colleagues, leaving her with deep-seated anger and resentment towards the sexist culture within the military.
· Subtext: When the AI takes control of her aircraft, Davis begins to suspect that it has singled her crew out because of her insecurities and is forced to recognize that she will have to overcome them to win this game of cat and mouse with the rogue AI.
· Layers: As Davis confronts her past traumas and insecurities, she learns to embrace her vulnerabilities and harness them as a source of strength and resilience in the face of adversity.
Character to character
· Conflict: Conflict may arise between Captain Davis and Major Thompson due to differences in leadership styles and conflicting priorities during the crisis with the rogue AI. Also, the crew’s skepticism towards Captain Davis’s early decisions may lead to conflict as they struggle to trust her judgment in the face of the escalating threat.
· Hidden Agenda: Davis may suspect a hidden agenda from external factors, such as rival nations or terrorist organizations, who seek to exploit the chaos caused by the rogue AI for their own nefarious purposes.
· Conspiracy: A conspiracy could involve a mole within the crew, possibly to further the actions of the rogue AI. Why? To keep the AI in play as the mission progresses.
· Intrigue: Intrigue may arise from the revelation of a double agent or sleeper agent within the crew, whose true allegiance and motivations remain shrouded in secrecy until the final act of the story.
Character Situation
· Dilemma: Davis grapples with a dilemma when she discovers evidence suggesting that a trusted member of her crew may be working against them, forcing her to confront the possibility of betrayal and make difficult decisions about whom to trust.
· Secret Identity: While this is unlikely, Davis may be the mole herself, having been subverted by a foreign agent who knew of her insecurities earlier in her career.
Encapsulated Character: Captain Davis is the pilot of a B-1B that is overtaken by a rogue AI to drop a nuclear bomb on Beijing, China.
- Secret: She feels she can’t live up to the standards of her many-times decorated aviator father.
- Wound: She suffered harassment and discrimination by male cadets during her training.
- Motivation: Honor her father by protecting her crew and finishing her missions and prove the bullies wrong.
- Hidden Agenda: She suspects a crew member of being a mole for the rogue AI.
- Dilemma: Confront the mole or work in ancillary ways to thwart them.
- Conspiracy: Conspire with the mole in her crew to uncover the AI?
CO-PILOT: MAJOR JACK “HAMMER” THOMPSON
Internal Character Depth
· Motivation: Thompson needs to confront his fear of failure and embrace the inherent risks of military service. Internally, he desires to find a way to leave a legacy of service and sacrifice that will make the parents he never knew proud.
· Secret: Thompson uses a vintage pocket watch that was passed down through generations of his family. The secret is that Thompson stole it from his father’s room the morning he ran away from home.
· Wound: Jack carries the emotional scars of a childhood marked by poverty and hardship. His escape route involved running away from home and joining the Air Force. Thompson doesn’t know if he’s still alive or not.
· Subtext: Thompson carries the weight of a missed opportunity to reconcile with his estranged father, whom he spotted in a crowd once but couldn’t bring himself to approach, haunted by the unresolved tension between them.
· Layers: Thompson’s backstory is gradually revealed, exposing the depths of his insecurities and the lengths to which he will go to prove himself in the eyes of his superiors and peers.
Character to character
· Conflict: Thompson’s internal conflict stems from his resentment towards Captain Davis’s promotion over him, fueling his skepticism and reluctance to follow her lead, especially when faced with the unpredictable nature of the rogue AI.
· Hidden Agenda: Thompson’s hidden agenda revolves around protecting his own interests and reputation, even if it means sacrificing the safety and well-being of the crew, as he seeks to distance himself from any blame or responsibility for the escalating crisis.
· Conspiracy: Thompson suspects a conspiracy within the crew itself, but he keeps it to himself and tells no one, including Captain Davis.
· Intrigue: Intrigue follows Thompson as he attempts to downplay his negative feelings toward the liberal elites in charge of the US Department of Defense, with some success, and toward China, with no success.
Character Situation
· Dilemma: Thompson is faced with a dilemma when he learns that the only way to save the aircraft and crew from certain death is to sacrifice himself by defusing the nuke. Will it make him the hero, or will he fail at making the sacrifice as he’s failed at everything else?
· Secret Ability: Thompson has an exceptional memory that he keeps hidden. He wants to avoid drawing by concealing this ability. As a youth, he was exploited by his father, so he feined losing his talent.
Encapsulated Character: Major Thompson is the co-pilot of a B-1B that is overtaken by a rogue AI to drop a nuclear bomb on Beijing, China.
- Motivation: Thompson needs to confront his fear of failure and embrace the inherent risks of military service. Internally, he desires to find a way to leave a legacy of service and sacrifice that will make the parents he never knew proud. Does he eventually reveal to Davis that they both had “Daddy issues?”
- Conspiracy: Thompson suspects a conspiracy within the crew itself, but he keeps it to himself and tells no one, including Captain Davis.
- Wound: Thompson must overcome the emotional scars brought on by a difficult adolescence. In many ways, these have been behind many of his adult failures.
- Dilemma: The only way to save the aircraft and crew from certain death is for Thompson to sacrifice himself by defusing the nuke. Does he have the self-confidence to do this or is he unwilling to try?
- Dilemma: Confront the mole or work in ancillary ways to thwart them.
- Secret Ability: Thompson must finally show that he has an eidetic memory. Can he employ it to help defuse the nuke?
Encapsulated Character: Lt. Mark “G.S.” Rodriguez is the Systems Officer in a B-1B that is overtaken by a rogue AI to drop a nuclear bomb on Beijing, China.
- Motivation: Rodriguez’s external goal is to ensure the safety and success of the mission, using his expertise in aircraft systems to overcome any challenges that arise. Inside, Rodriguez wants to prove himself beyond his technical abilities, yearning for recognition and validation of his worth as a Hispanic officer in a totally non-Hispanic crew.
- Wound: Rodriguez’s grandparents emigrated from Honduras in the ’80s and he has not forgotten the stigma his family had to endure.
- Secret: Rodriguez’s major secret revolves around his family’s immigration struggles and the sacrifices they made for him to pursue his career in the military. He hides this to avoid facing discrimination from his peers.
- Intrigue: Rodriguez is caught in the middle of the crew’s discontent as he navigates the complex dynamics of loyalty and betrayal.
- Conspiracy: Rodriguez keeps a watchful eye on his surroundings at all times, wary of any hidden agenda that may threaten the mission.
WEAPONS OFFICER: SERGEANT KYLE “JOKER” REYNOLDS
Encapsulated Character: Sergeant Reynolds is the Weapons Officer of a B-1B that is overtaken by a rogue AI to drop a nuclear bomb on Beijing, China.
- Motivation: On the surface, Reynolds is confident and humorous. Internally, Reynolds harbors an unfulfilled drive to prove himself as more than a joker with a bomb in his hand.
- Subtext: Reynolds hides his true feelings of doubt and vulnerability behind his sense of humor and bravado, using comedy as a defense mechanism to deflect attention from his inner struggles. He fears being perceived as weak or inadequate and goes to great lengths to maintain his image as a competent and reliable soldier.
- Wound: Reynolds admits he’s scared of fatherhood because he feels he isn’t up to the responsibilities. He wishes he could do more.
- Dilemma: Reynolds faces a dilemma when he must choose between following orders and protecting his family from imminent danger. Making either choice forces Reynolds to confront his priorities and make a difficult decision.
- Secret Identity: Reynolds’s secret identity is as a devoted husband. No one on the crew knows about his family and he’s not about to disclose this info without a reason.
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 1 month ago by
Tom Carroll.
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 1 month ago by
Tom Carroll. Reason: I added the deep character traits required for this module
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 1 month ago by
Tom Carroll. Reason: I finished adding the rest of the crew to the deep dive background info. Satisfying!!
-
This reply was modified 1 year, 1 month ago by
Tom Carroll. Reason: I took out the NOTE that I had left because it wasn't needed anymore
-
Mark Roeder’s Character Depth:
What I learned doing this assignment is none of my three characters seemed likable enough to be the main character, so I invented a new character, Magdalena, who could be the right protagonist, and got deeper into the conflict between the characters.
Simple Profile for SKYLAR:
Skylar is writer who rises from the dead and traps the cast and crew of a movie he wrote but didn’t get credit for.
Motivation: to trap filmmakers who stole his credit and make them suffer
Wound: Everest took credit for writing his movie
Layers: Skylar made a deal with an evil spirit. He sabotaged the deal for credit himself
Conflict: He’s keeping Everest, Ivy and Magdalena trapped in graveyard. Ivy, Skylar’s wife, gave his script to Everest, the director, who took credit for it.
Simple profile for EVEREST:
Everest is a director who takes credit for writing Skylar’s script and gets trapped in the graveyard when it caves in and Skylar’s corpse won’t let him leave.
Secret: he didn’t really write movie. He committed adultery with Ivy.
Subtext: Hiding that he didn’t write movie, wasn’t even his idea. That he committed adultery with Ivy. Hiding from truth.
Layers: he didn’t really write movie. He committed adultery with Ivy.
Conflict: He stole or took credit for Skylar’s script. Skylar’s corpse won’t let him leave graveyard. Ivy’s mad because some of her scenes were cut from movie, as Everest made himself the main character she was supposed to be. Magdalena, his wife, the producer/editor, catches him cheating on her with Ivy and threatens divorce.
Simple Profile for IVY:
Ivy’s an actress who has to get out of character and a graveyard her husband Skylar’s corpse won’t let her leave.
Motivation:
Want: to get out of graveyard and be famous actress
Need: to get out of character
Secret: that she cheated on Skylar with Everest, that she brought Skylar’s script to Everest and let him take credit for it to get part. Maybe she had something to do with Skylar’s death.
Subtext: hides that she cheated on Skylar with Everest. That she brought Everest Skylar’s script and let him take credit for it to get part.
Layers: she cheated on Skylar with Everest. She brought script to him and let him take credit for it to be in it. She’s not being herself, still in character, hiding who she really is.
Conflict: she cheated on Skylar with Everest. Brought Skylar’s script to Everest. Skylar’s corpse won’t let them leave. She may have had something to do with Skylar’s death. Thinks Everest ruined movie by acting in it (and that he can’t act) and cutting some of her scenes out to make his part bigger. Maybe she wants Everest dead because he knows something. Maybe they conspired to kill Skylar too, but then he committed suicide. Magdalena, Everest’s wife, catches her with Everest and threatens to cut her out of movie and recast it.
Conspiracy: she brought script to Everest and let him take credit if she got part in it. She cheated on Skylar with Everest.
Secret identity: she’s really Ivy but she’s still in character and can’t get out.
Simple Profile for MAGDALENA:
Magdalena, the director Everest’s wife, the producer/ editor who cut Skylar’s name from the credits and fights to escape when Skylar’s corpse won’t let them leave.
Motivation: Want: to escape graveyard
Conflict: she catches Everest with Ivy against a tree near Skylar’s grave. Threatens divorce and to let truth out. Magdalena threatens to cut Ivy completely out of movie and recast her part. Skylar keeps Magdalena trapped because she cut his name out of credits and let Everest get away with stealing his credit.
Conspiracy: Conspires with Ivy to try to cut Everest’s part down to make the movie better.
-
Alfred Dunham’s Character Depth
“What I learned doing this assignment is –
Figuring out what makes a person tick can be a long and hard process, as well as searching for the factors that have made them what they are. But it is precisely those factors that make the story.
ASSIGNMENT 4
1. With each of your characters, go through these questions to see which might fit for your story.
DECISION:
AS A STARTING POINT FOR ME, I TOOK THE DRAMATICA EIGHT OBJECTIVE ARCHETYPE CHARACTERS AND HAVE COMBINED EACH DRIVER CHARACTER WITH ONE OF THE PASSENGER CHARACTERS TO MAKE FOUR COMPLEX CHARACTERS.
CHARACTERISTICS
ARCHETYPES CHARACTER ACTIION/DECISION
1. Protagonist: Albert Dunston Pursue/Consider
+Sidekick: Support/Faith
2. Guardian: Nurse Helen Help/Conscience
+Reason: Control/Logic
3. Antagonist: Mr. Archie Cobb Prevent/Reconsider
+Skeptic: Oppose/Disbelief
4. Contagonist: James (Doc) Andrews Hinder/Temptation
+Emotion: Uncontrolled/Feeling
Internal Character Depth
Albert
<ul type=”disc”>
- Motivation:
From his Archetype, PROTAGONIST, point of view.
Action = Pursue
To the rest of the world, Albert is considered an outsider, and he’s found that unless he goes after what he wants, he isn’t going to get it. So, asking questions gets him into trouble, but the downside of his religious group is that they’ve already turned into outsiders. They’ve created a monster they can’t control.
Decision = Consider
Albert is smart enough to figure stuff out. He questions and finds answers, and then he acts on those answers, moderated by the opinions of others. But ultimately, he makes his own decisions.
From his Archetype, SIDEKICK, point of view
Action = Support
Albert’s religious faith has taught him to be a team player and to support the group – to be cooperative – to a point
Decision = Faith
Albert has a strong Evangelical faith, but he’s figured out that unless there is an evidential component to it, it’s mere blind belief, which makes no sense to him. So, he stirs up trouble with his disturbing but honest questions.
<ul type=”disc”>
- Secret:
Everybody has secrets, right? Albert’s unique secret is that he has no secrets.
<ul type=”disc”>
- Wound:
Albert’s religious beliefs have placed him outside the box – an oddball – an outsider. He desperately wants/needs friends, and at an academic academy, he has finally found the one true friend to exceed all others. But now, they are separated, and she may change her mind about him. He’s desperate.
<ul type=”disc”>
- Subtext:
1. Albert has memories of a pre-religious life.
2. Albert is experiencing a different way of life from his old ways.
3. Albert is envisioning and partially experiencing a new way of life that is further antagonistic to his old and current ways. This is unsettling to him. No secret decisions; Just up in the air consternation.
<ul type=”disc”>
- Layers:
Albert’s changing identity, thoughts, roles, and growth as the story progresses. He is a CHANGE character and will have an ARC.
Helen
<ul type=”disc”>
- Motivation:
From her Archetype, GUARDIAN, point of view.
Action = Help
She still has the instincts of a good nurse
Decision = Conscience
And being a serious spiritual woman, she still has a good sense of right and wrong to guide her.
From his Archetype, REASON, point of view
Action = Control
Helen is very much of her emotions… something of a necessity, working with the likes of the many Archie-types.
Decision = Logic
And she runs her unit/ward in a way that makes sense, even to the knuckleheads who want to cause trouble.
<ul type=”disc”>
- Secret:
Helen lost a son many years ago. Few people know that. And she doesn’t talk about it – too painful.
<ul type=”disc”>
- Wound:
Helen’s grief, having lost both her son and, later, her husband, has almost left her retracted within herself.
<ul type=”disc”>
- Subtext:
There are questions surrounding the death of her son. Maybe she had something to do with it? Maybe not, but she carries that burden, too.
<ul type=”disc”>
- Layers:
Helen is the STEADFAST character that brings balance to Alberts’s CHANGE character, but Steadfast characters are still dynamic and do “change,” just in a different, more subtle way.
Archie
<ul type=”disc”>
- Motivation:
From his Archetype, ANTAGONIST, point of view.
Action = Prevent
Decision = Reconsider
From his Archetype, SKEPTIC, point of view
Action = Oppose
Decision = Disbelief
<ul type=”disc”>
- Secret:
Archie knows better than he puts on. He has a past that’s unethical, even immoral and he’s not proud of it, even though he pretends he is.
<ul type=”disc”>
- Wound:
A one-time friend set him up and let him take the fall. Archie almost didn’t survive either the emotional letdown or the financial ruin.
<ul type=”disc”>
- Subtext:
“In climbing the ladder of success, step on your competitors before they have a chance to step on you.” And to Archie, everyone is a competitor.
<ul type=”disc”>
- Layers:
I have no idea. It’s going to be fun to see where this goes.
James
<ul type=”disc”>
- Motivation:
From his Archetype, CONTAGONIST, point of view.
Action = Hinder
The hinder character may appear tough, but he/she is actually weak, borrowing the strength of their Antagonist leader. The Devil boasts, “I shall be like the Most High….” But he gets thrown out of Heaven anyway.
Decision = Temptation
The role of the CON (together) TGAGONIST is to tempt one to join the dark side. They are not the dark side itself. Merely the lackey that encourages the joining.
From his Archetype, EMOTION, point of view
Action = Uncontrolled
The EMOTION character is the “crybaby.” They scream, cry, pout, makeup excuses, and throw tantrums. We see this a lot in politics.
Decision = Feeling
They make decisions based on how they feel now. Not by questions of whether it’s logical, honest, ethical, moral, or even good for them. They are infantile in their wanting what they want when they want it.
<ul type=”disc”>
- Secret:
James is a medical student, but he’s not all that bright. In fact, he has little chance of ever passing his Board Exams. He is a little rich kid, a failure in the making.
<ul type=”disc”>
- Wound:
He feels a disappointment to his family – a slacker. Because he truly is.
<ul type=”disc”>
- Subtext:
James’ wealthy family has pushed him along, and James has just given in. As he got lazy and slid along, he began to see life, the world, and himself in condescending terms.
<ul type=”disc”>
- Layers:
James has experienced a series of steps that have made him what he now is. Will he be able to turn this illness around… or not?
Character to Character
Albert
· Conflict:
Albert is at odds with Archie and James. Albert wants answers; Archie just wants to mess with people
· Hidden Agenda:
Albert’s only agenda is to get well and go home.
· Conspiracy:
Albert and Helen seem to be ganged up on Archie and James, but it’s the other way around.
· Intrigue:
Albert’s agenda is to only to get well and go home, and his comings and goings, by permission, leave everyone puzzled.
Helen
· Conflict:
Helen’s conflict with Albert is entirely different from her conflict with Archie and James. One is helpful conflict; the other is destructive.
· Hidden Agenda:
Helen has no hidden agenda, regardless of what others say or imply about her.
· Conspiracy:
Ditto for Conspiracy
· Intrigue:
There is something about Helen that piques other’scuriosity. She never gets angry. After all, she is Controlled (her REASON characteristic). We should expect that.
Archie
· Conflict:
Archie conflicts with everyone on every issue. He’s just a bad-ass troublemaker
· Hidden Agenda:
Archie must be in control, even though he may not know what that means.
· Conspiracy:
He wants Helen gone, and Albert annoys him.
· Intrigue:
Archie seems to be on the phone a lot. What’s he up to?
James
· Conflict:
James is self-conflicted and badly as Archie is, outwardly.
· Hidden Agenda:
James can’t seem to decide if he even wants to survive.
· Conspiracy:
James is in a very weak conspiracy with Archie to destroy Helen and Albert, but he has no real stomach for it, and he sort of likes Albert. Sometimes, he’s “with the program,” and sometimes, not so much.
· Intrigue:
James is doing things to defeat his on medical care – and Albert catches him and tries to talk him out of it.
Character Situation
Albert
· Dilemma:
Will he continue to find a way to believe, or will he have to change again?
Will he survive? But if he does, will his life be anything like it was?
· Secret Identity:
None
Helen
· Dilemma:
Helen is afraid to bond with Albert with whom she as so much like her own son. Whether he lives or dies, he will one day leave.
· Secret Identity:
None
Archie
· Dilemma:
Archie is in deep, deep denial. And he is pushing away the very people he needs to survive. Just how far can he continue to play his games?
Secret Identity:
Is he really who he says he is?
James
· Dilemma: James is a failure. Will he attempt to get well and change that embarrassment, or become complacent with what he knows about himself and die, taking the easy way out?
· Secret Identity:
Are there other things his family does not know? Yet?
2. With each character, create a simple profile like the example above for LOCKE.
Each Archetype Driver Character has been paired with one of the Passenger Characters to form a Complex Character.
This renders Albert with the Active role of being the character with a goal. So, he pursues the goal of getting well, even though he never will. In Dramatica terms, under Albert’s Plot Dynamics, his OUTCOME will be FAILURE, but his JUDGMENT will be GOOD. And as he CONSIDERS Nurse Helen’s HELP, he SUPPORTS her LOGIC, and his FAITH is adjusted via the evidence she brings to the discussion – her CONSCIENCE is based on experience and Albert trusts that..
Helen’s Active role of HELP is being thwarted by Archie and James, but Albert is reaching out and accepting it. He is, after all, smart enough to accept the LOGIC in her thinking, and he recognizes her good conscience as honest and worth CONSIDERATION. Helen is also a very well-put-together woman who is in CONTROL of her emotions and is thus able to survive the misguided insults from Archie and James. This, in turn, makes it easy for Albert to do the same. James’ lack of control makes him look scatterbrained to Albert, and James’ trust in Archie also seems to make him look like a fool to Albert. Archie’s apparent attempt to prevent Albert from reaching his goal seems to Albert to be both backward and mean-spirited, and his arguments seem more like weak attempts to justify Archie’s illogical beliefs and bad behavior.
In Summary:
The primary conflict pattern is between PROTAGONIST Albert and ANTAGONIST Archie.
The secondary conflict pattern is between GUARDIAN Nurse Helen and CONTAGONIST James.
Albert and Helen are co-operative characters, as are –
Archie and James. However, all the characters share in the overall conflict to some degree.
To be specific, to view this as a four-part grid:
1. Diagonals = Dynamic Pairs [Overall Story vs Subjective Story] vs.
[Impact Character vs Main Character]
2. Horizontals = Companion Pairs [Overall Story vs Main Character] vs.
[Impact Character vs Subjective Story]
3. Verticals = Dependent Pairs [Overall Story vs Impact Character] vs
[Main Character vs Subjective Story]
4. Each Cell = A Component [the Overall Story]
3. Compare the character profiles to each other to see what conflicts can emerge from them.
1. Religious beliefs (in general)
2. Philosophy of life (in general)
3. Science
4. Medicine
5. Individuality vs. cooperation (working together)
6. Authority
7. Coping skills vs. morbid acceptance
8. Other
Log in to reply.